Can we do anything about a thread that doesn't mention us?

Why the ranking is a work list

Every cited page that does not mention you is a target with a number on it: how many answers cite it, how many of those name you, and how its share of the network is moving. Sorting by that gives an order of work rather than a report. A thread cited in forty answers that never names you comes before a post cited twice. The prompts behind each row tell you which buyer question the page is answering.

What the work looks like

The right move depends on the page. Our team does each of these in Managed GEO; in GEO Consulting and Trends your own teams do them with the list.

• A reply in the thread that answers what people there were actually asking, with your product where it fits. When the engine re-reads the thread, the reply is part of what it sees.
• An outreach to the creator whose video or review the engines keep citing. The review is the source; being in it is the outcome.
• A comparison page of your own that gives the engine a better source than the thread. The next article in a content routine targets the incumbents the most-cited threads represent.

None of this promises a change in the answer. It changes what the engine has to work with the next time it looks.

How you know it worked

The Mentioned column is the readout. If the answers citing that page start naming you, the count moves, and the row's detail shows the date your brand first appeared in an answer citing it. Because every prompt runs daily, the movement shows once the engines re-read the source, and the monthly report carries the list and what changed.