Know what AI says about you, and whether it is true.

No. The free audit comes first, and every engagement starts with it: it checks whether AI crawlers can read your site and what your pages give them, and takes a first look at where you land in the answers against competitors. The accuracy audit is the second half, and it comes with a scoped engagement. It adds a question set per market, daily runs on every major AI engine, and a person reading the recorded answers claim by claim. It is the first deliverable of both Managed GEO and GEO Consulting & Trends, and we plan the rest of the engagement from its report.

The recording is. The reading is not. The platform runs each prompt once a day on ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot, and Google AI Mode, and keeps the full answer, every cited source, and which brands it named and how early. It does not judge whether a claim is true, and we have not met a tool that can. A person on our team reads the recorded answers, logs each claim about you with its status, engine, market, and source, and writes the report. That takes longer than a score would, and it is the only version we would put our name on.

Because one answer is one draw. Ask the same engine the same question twice and you can get a different list of brands, or a different price cited to a different source. A screenshot from one person’s account tells you what that person saw that day. The audit reads every recorded answer for the window, usually the first weeks of tracking, so each claim is logged with how often it appeared and on which days. A wrong claim that turns up in most runs goes to the top of the fix list; one that appeared once gets noted and watched.

A statement about you that is not true today: a wrong price, a wrong owner, a product you discontinued, a location you closed, a person who left, a feature you do not have, or a competitor’s product attributed to you. We log those separately from outdated claims, which were true once, and from missing ones, where the engine does not know something you would want a buyer to hear. Unfavourable framing gets its own status: a claim that is accurate but chosen against you, such as an old complaint quoted as the summary of your support. Every entry names the engine, the market, and the cited source.

That is the choice the report sets up. On Managed GEO, our team does it: we correct the pages the engines cite, update or claim the listings, publish the comparisons and answers that are missing, and keep reading the answers each month to confirm the claim has changed. On GEO Consulting & Trends, the fix list goes to the teams that own each source, and the daily tracking keeps running so they see each claim move as their work lands. Either way, we will not give you a date by which an engine will say the new thing, but we will show you the day it does.