Do you fix what it finds?

What a fix looks like in Managed GEO

Every failed check comes back with a one-line hint, and turning those hints into a roadmap is the part our team does. Some fixes are a file: a robots.txt that lets the 20 AI crawlers reach the path, an llms.txt at the root that opens with a heading. Some are structure: one H1 instead of three, at least two H2s, a canonical tag, Open Graph title, description, and image. Some are content, which is where the audit and the writing meet: a page under 300 words of real text, or with fewer than three internal links, fails the Content checks, and a page whose text only appears after JavaScript fails Rendering. Those get rewritten, or rebuilt so the text sits in the HTML.

We ship each change to your site ourselves, then run the audit again on the same URL. Every run is kept, so the fail and the pass sit as two rows in the history, and you see the same rows in your login.

What changes under GEO Consulting and Trends

Large companies have engineers, a release process, and more properties than we could touch by hand. So we audit the templates behind those properties rather than every page, and we hand your team a prioritised list with the check names on it. Prioritised means ordered by what moves the score and by what carries furthest: a template fix lands on every page built on it. Your engineers ship, then verify each fix in the same tool, against the same 21 rules.

The part the audit does not cover

The audit tells you whether a page can be read. Whether the engines then choose it is measured elsewhere, by the daily runs of your buyers' questions, and the content gaps those runs expose are the other half of the roadmap.